Salmons and Crofts

Bob

Reuben Henry Lewis Croft

(who preferred to be known as Bob)

Born Jarrow, June 14, 1891 (or 1892)

Died Cardiff, August 4, 1958

Bob’s life splits into three parts—his childhood and youth in Jarrow on Tyneside in County Durham, his life from his mid-teens to his early twenties as a professional soccer player moving about Great Britain from club to club, and his four decades of married life in Cardiff, South Wales. Of the Cardiff part we have eye-witness testimony, including my own. Of the years before his marriage to my grandmother we know very little.

1: The Jarrow (Dis)Connection

Bob was born in Jarrow in June 1892, or, possibly, 1891 since he gives his age as 23 on his May 1918 wedding certificate. His parents were George Henry Croft, born 1960 in Wolverhampton, a town in the Midlands, and Catherine Croft, née Grieves, born 1862 in Hebburn, South Tyne side. We have yet to find out when either parent died or the cause of their deaths.  Bob had one older sibling, Mary Anne Croft, born in Jarrow in 1889. She married James Clark, and they had one child, a son also called James.

Bob

Bob Croft (Gill Collection)

Note on the back of Bob’s picture (Gill Collection)

Few reminiscences have come down in the family to give life to these few bald facts. Anything Bob may have told Nana about his Jarrow childhood and Nana may have told my mother Esme, has died with them and Bob Croft was not a writing man. Tom Croft was very close to his father, but he says he has not a single piece of paper in Bob’s handwriting. Thus, it was a good moment for the family historian in me when I happened to take a closer look at a photo-postcard that Nana had kept. It shows Bob looking smart in a hat and overcoat and on the back, along with the date stamp “Dec.8 1935” is the inscription “your affectionate Cousin Bob xxx”.

The cousin addressed may have been someone in Jarrow, and I can attest that the very school boyish handwriting is not Nana’s. Here is an inscription in her handwriting to her brother Clem and his wife Gladys on the back of another photo-postcard she didn’t get round to mailing.

Given his extreme reluctance to put pen to paper, communication between Bob and his Jarrow relatives presumably lapsed once he left the city in his very early teens to begin a career as an itinerant professional football player. It seems likely that Nana may have met a member of her husband’s family only in the week of her wedding.

Inscription by Mabel Croft on the back of the picture of Esme Croft below. (Gill Collection)

Certainly, once he married and settled down in Cardiff, Bob seems to have seen little of nothing of his Jarrow family. My uncle Tom Croft remembers that, as a very small boy, he was taken to Jarrow by his mother, but his only memory is of his auntie Mary’s sweet shop, but this seems to have been the only visit and that Bob did not accompany his wife and son. As we shall see in the next chapter, Nana had had difficulty delivering her first child—my mother—who was breech, b’s but Tom’s birth eight years later had been straightforward, and I can imagine her being eager to show off her little pride and joy to her husband’s relatives.

In Nana’s South Wales family feuding was endemic, as we shall see, but there is no reason to think Bob and his sister and Grieves cousins had quarreled. Friendly and regular if infrequent contact between Jarrow and Cardiff was kept up by letters and cards, and, with Bob not being a writing man, the correspondence was conducted by the women in the family—first Nana and then my mother-- even though they barely knew one another. Keeping in touch by letter was a passion and a mission for my mother, and I remember in the 1950s trotting down to the postbox with Christmas cards addressed to “Grieves”.

I see some significance in this pattern of interaction between the Cardiff Crofts and the Jarrow Crofts/Grieves/Clarks since it was largely a matter of choice. Certainly, money was short on both sides of the Croft family, and, after the death of her father in 1931, Nana was very tied down by the care of her mother, Catherine Salmon. However, in the 1920s and 1930s, railway travel was affordable even to people of modest means, and those who wanted to get together on important family occasions could and did.  Bob, as we shall see, had discretionary money from his successful betting strategy, but we have no record of him taking a few days off to attend the wedding of a nephew or the funeral of an auntie up North.

This photo is believed to show Nana (left) at the time of her wedding and the woman standing next to her is probably her sister-in-law, Mary Croft Clark. (Gill Collection)

As for Nana, my guess is she felt that the less she and her children saw of Bob’s relatives the better. Like her mother before her and her daughter after her, Nana was a lower-to-middle-middle class woman intent on upward mobility and exquisitely sensitive to gradations in class hierarchy. She knew very well that Bob himself was not the man her parents would have chosen for her, and his relatives did not seem to be the kind of people with whom she had been brought up to associate. So, Mabel Salmon Croft took her holidays in Ilfracombe not Scarboroug and sent the Jarrovians studio photographs of her well-groomed husband and delightful little daughter. (Such an unusual, upscale name, Esme. it could even be written with a French accent!)

Esme Catherine Croft aged about eight. (Gill Collection)

Such middle-class snobbery was pretty typical of the interwar period in the U.K., and, as I outlined in the introduction to this memoir, my family over three or four generations, was busy moving up from the industrial working class into the commercial lower-middle class and into the affluent professional class. But as I study my family’s social patterns, it becomes clear that moving up meant leaving some people behind, people who no longer fitted into the new social order being aspired to.  The Jarrow Crofts/Grieves/Clarks did not fit into the social vision Mabel Salmon Croft had for her family, but luckily, they lived a long and tedious train journey away so she could keep them at a distance, literally and figuratively. My mother Esme Croft Scobie, as we shall see, will do the same in her generation with the bulk of her husband’s family, the Gilberts/Clodes--and they lived just across town.  

I have one small fact to add to this meager collection of information about Bob’s Jarrow family—a long forgotten memory from my teenage years that suddenly popped up as I was wiring this essay. This event must have occurred soon after my family and I had moved to 52 Kimberley Road in 1958—itself a move “up” as we shall see in my chapter on my parents.

One evening, the doorbell rang, and I answered it. Few visitors ever dropped by our house uninvited, so I was expecting to see an insurance agent or a neighbor begging a cup of sugar. Instead, on the step, stood a couple of people who said they were my relatives from Jarrow. This took me as much by surprise as if they had said Outer Mongolia, but after I had gone back inside to announce the visitors, my mother, rushed to the door, welcomed the strangers in, and ushered them into the dining room.  I was sent off to do my homework in my bedroom upstairs while my grandmother and my mother gave the visitors tea and ushered them out, and nothing more was said. Looking back, I think this impromptu visit must been occasioned by the sudden and shocking death of Bob the previous year which my mother would have dutifully reported to his relatives, along with our new address. If over the teatime, along with expressions of sympathy over the death, there was talk of the old days in Jarrow when Bob was a boy, I was, alas, not privy to it.

All of this amounts to very little indeed. Once he had moved to Cardiff, my grandfather seems to have put his life in Jarrow in a memory box and shut the lid even to those closest to him. I often find myself reminiscing to my grandchildren and passing on some of the old family stories, but Bob seems to have felt no need to reminisce, to unburden himself of the past. Did he love his parents? Did they die young, and were he and his big sister taken in by family members who had little to spare? How hard was life for him in Jarrow as boy and young adolescent? We shall probably never have an answer to any of these questions since the last living witness, my uncle Tom Croft, although he was deeply attached to his father and lived close to him, can bring no light to bear.

 As the would-be biographer of my grandfather Bob, I find this reticence and the dearth of family papers like letters and diaries or even bills frustrating.  “The child is father to the man” has been my motto as a biographer i, and I have always found the keys to my subjects in their early life--their social class, their family relationships, their peer friendships, their schooling. For Bob those keys are largely missing, but I cheer myself on by remembering that historical evidence is fragmentary, and biography is always, in the end, a story about one person told by someone else. Once we place the names and dates we have for my grandfather within the context of English social history circa 1900, the portrait of a man in a specific place and time begins to emerge.

 In my mind’s eye I have a picture of a clever, good-looking, quiet, athletic lad, always ready for some fun and popular with boys and girls. I see a pre-adolescent who is tossed into the work force young, finds he can turn his hand to any number of things, and is ready to bet on his own talents. I see a mature man who, despite formidable obstacles--not least a World War that killed millions of his contemporaries—comes out several rungs above his father and grandfathers on the social ladder.

A Note to My Readers: Given the paucity of biographical documentation and anecdote on Bob’s Jarrow years, the following section is my attempt to use general English social history to place him in his time and place and explain the great challenges he faced as a child and youth.  The section is designed especially for my American readers, especially the young ones.  My British readers, who understand this history better than I, are invited to skip to section 4.

2. Early Barriers to Upward Mobility

Reuben Henry Lewis Croft was given a rather grand set of names at his (unrecorded) christening, but he was born in a small, grimy, port city in the far Northeast of England. His parents were working class and possibly illiterate since they left only their names on the social record. To be working class, to be a Northerner, and to be a Geordie were the first three big hurdles our athletic young Bob had to clear.  

 My young readers have to understand that, unless you were a scion to one of the ancient aristocratic families of Northumbria like the Percys or the Nevilles, being a Northerner has generally been seen by the English themselves as a disadvantage. Ever since the Middle Ages, the England has been divided between “the South” and “the North” (with my native Wales as a mere parenthesis), and the social and political hub of the nation, then as now, was London and its six so-called “Home Counties”. The further North you go, the feeling went among the ruling Southerners, the colder the weather, the more savage the inhabitants, and the more uncouth their speech. Only when you, as it were, fell off the map into the North Sea and landed in the Highlands of Scotland where the royals since Victoria have taken to frolicking in the heather, can anything civilized be found.

Geographically, of course, the ancient English North-South border made little sense since it came as far south as what the map tells us is England’s heartland--the Midland counties of Yorkshire, Lancashire, Cheshire, Derbyshire, Lincolnshire, and Nottinghamshire. But socially the invisible border counted for a great deal since it divided the country into the haves and the have-nots, the ins and the outs, the couth and the uncouth.

Jarrow in Tyneside is almost as far north in England as you can go. 

Now, a big part of the (perceived) uncouthness of the Northern English was the way they spoke and the words they used. One comic anecdote that has come down to us from the Middle Ages has two merchants from Kent finding it impossible to procure some basic items from a Northern farmer. Basically, the joke is that it was harder for a Southern Englishman to communicate with a Northern Englishman than with a Frenchman.

Of all the Northern English dialects the toughest was, by common consensus, our Bob’s native Geordie.

It will be hard for Americans to grasp just how much a barrier to social climbing a regional accent was in Great Britain circa 1900. Even today’s young Brits might underestimate the problem because, as far as I can observe, since the 1960s there has been a steady move to de-hierarchize British accents. I notice that nowadays BBC announcers are no longer required to use what used to be called “Standard” or “BBC” English. Instead, they proudly stick with their regional accent which, if that announcer comes from Glasgow or Belfast, can make them barely comprehensible even to expats like myself. Those among my grandkids who adore the Great British Baking Show will remember how, in Series 9, much of the ready banter of the orange-haired young woman from Liverpool might just as well have been in Serbo-Croat.

This democratization of accent, let me note for the royalists out there, reaches to the very top of the ladder. William, Prince of Wales, sounds much more like his working class-born friend Elton John than like his grandmother Queen Elizabeth or his father, King Charles. Run a recording of a speech by old Etonian William and a speech by old Etonian Anthony Eden and the difference in accent is striking. But all this linguistic evening up and smoothing over is a very recent phenomenon and here I will allow myself a digression.

Those who love musicals will recall the scene at the opening of My Fair Lady where Henry Higgins is making notations of the speech of the Cockneys around him at Covent Garden and boasts of his ability to “place” them not just to a borough but to a street. Well, in my experience as a lower-middle-class girl with a regional accent, Higgins had only perfected and professionalized a skill that was common among his compatriots. I can testify that in the 1960s you had only to utter five words in Great Britain and those around you, trained amateur linguists to a man or a woman, would without thinking not just place you geographically but make a good guess at what kind of school you went to, which in turn was a prime indicator of rank. Given this social reality, a woman might, in the bad old days, marry a lord or have several degrees to her name, but if she had a regional accent, she would still, in Nancy Mitford’s classic formulation, be classed as “non-u”--not REALLY one of US. Those surrounding Prince William, you royalist groupies may remember, were worried that Catherine (or Kate!)  the future queen consort might have family who said serviette, not napkin, and went to the bathroom not the loo.

To recapitulate then, being a Northerner and growing up speaking Geordie were two strikes against the young Bob Croft. The third and potentially fatal strike was that he was a member of the industrial working class at a time when the barriers to upward mobility in England were not just high but spiked with zebra wire, and zealously patrolled. In fact, being a Geordie was almost synonymous with working class since the ancient prejudice against the North and its strange speech had been intensified in the nineteenth century when the Midlands and North became associated with heavy industry and international trade.

Early industrialization powered the machine that made the United Kingdom of Great Britain and (then) Ireland the world’s hegemonic power for most of the nineteenth century. It was the textile mills, coal mines, iron and steel works, and shipyards of the North, the Midlands, the lowlands of Scotland and South Wales (along with the wealth made in the Caribbean slave trade and plundered from its colonies, let me add) that transformed a tiny island kingdom into the greatest empire the world had seen since Imperial Rome. But if the nation’s money was increasingly being made in the North and the Celtic fringes, British political and cultural power was centered on London and in the still largely agrarian and traditional Home Counties. And from Britain’s “South” came a howl of protest at what industrialization was doing not just to British society and culture but to the very soil and sod of the island of Great Britain.

The alarm was sounded as early as 1808 in William Blake’s “Jerusalem”, a poem that has become one of the most stirring hymns in the English language. Blake struck an apocalyptic tone in his poem, summoning his sword of burning gold and his chariot of fire to wipe out the “dark satanic mills” that had desecrated England’s “green and pleasant lands.” Government reports and sociological surveys along with great novels like Charles Dickens’s Hard Times and Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South offered heart-wrenching accounts of the blighted lives and blackened villages of workers, and a few working-class people found a way to publish their own harrowing stories. Robert Blincoe, for example, was an orphan consigned to the poor house as an infant who, when he was seven and big enough to be useful, was sold by the local authorities to a Midlands mill owner. In the mill, Blincoe remembers working twelve hours a day, six days a week, subsisting on bread and gruel, living in unheated, rat-infested dormitories, and getting frequent beatings.

This wealth of detail supplied by Victorian writers makes it easy for us to flesh out what life was like for the first generations of industrial workers, and among these were, it seems almost certain, Bob’s father and uncles and grandfathers. And yet, and yet, it was somewhere in the nineteenth century that OUR family and hundreds of thousands of families like ours begin to make our mark and even sign our names on the historical record.

The history of the Isle of Skye, as my friend Kathy Mockett has documented in detail, illustrates this process of social evolution in Britain very clearly. During the period of the great enclosures (between about 1785 and 1825), whole villages on Skye were burned down and tenant farmers were driven out and made homeless as the land was enclosed to promote sheep forming. It was a generational tragedy, a massive social trauma, but in the long run, it was, as they love to say in my beloved satire of English history 1066 And All That, A GOOD THING. Farming the rocky, wind-swept, salt-saturated soil of the Hebrides had offered a bare subsistence in good years, and famine in bad.  Forced off their land, the industrious, resilient inhabitants of Skye emigrated to the rest of Great Britain and to the world at large. There they struggled, survived, and, like Kathy’s own family, flourished. In the late twentieth century, they could return to Skye, reconnect to their roots, have glorious vacations, and even buy a third home.

As for British women, the pioneering and prolific nineteenth-century sociologist Harriet Martineau was out of step with male peers like Friedrich Engels when she dared to argue that, for women, working in industry was a big step up. But Martineau was right. For those who were poor and powerless like women, industrialization meant not just misery but opportunity. Just as, In the late twentieth century, men and women in China fled the land en masse to work in the new factories, so, by the second decade of the nineteenth century, the poor and displaced and disadvantaged in Britain were flocking to the new industrial centers. Many of them were Irish, fleeing the succession of potato famines.

The joys of England’s green and pleasant land were, it turned out, mainly a luxury enjoyed by landowners and suburban London poets like Blake. Those who did the plowing and the sowing and the milking showed an unromantic preference for the dark satanic mills. Industrial centers like Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle, and Cardiff offered not only jobs but schooling for both adults and children. Work on the farm was a 24/7/365-day business. In the factory, you were free by eight or nine at night, and those of a mind could read their Bibles or, like the Lowell mill girl Lucy Larcom, learn German in order to tackle Marx and Kant. As the century progressed, workers got Sundays off to relax, play games, and have a bit of fun not just once or twice a year on some religious festival, as in the previous millennia, but every week, by law and, increasingly, by right. Robert Blincoe got to tell the nation of his sufferings in the mill because in an industrial city he was able to learn to read and write.

Jarrow, Bob’s birthplace, was one of the places whose economic, social, and environmental circumstances were transformed by industrialization.  Jarrow can boast a glorious past, notably as the home of Bede (the extraordinary Christian divine whom the Catholic church in 1899 finally got around to promoting from Venerable to Saint) but it was a very distant past by the time the names of the Crofts and Grieves began appearing on birth certificates. Bede circa 720 CE mentions coal mining in the area near his abbey, but it was not until the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century that exploiting the huge coal reserves of County Durham became a priority for the new northern capitalist class. The ancient city of Newcastle-on Tyne transformed into the world’s major export center for coal and its attendant iron and steel industries. “Carrying coals to Newcastle” came to be an everyday expression in the U.S.A. as well as the U.K. for doing something that makes no commercial sense. Jarrow was the closest port to Newcastle, and, following the founding in 1865 of the highly successful Palmer Ship-Building and Iron Company, Jarrow ballooned from a sleepy village into a bustling industrial town, dominated by the shipbuilding industry. At the height of its prosperity Palmer employed eighty percent of the Jarrow work force. The likelihood is that the men in Bob’s family had some connection to the shipyards.

By the time Bob was born, the horrors described by Engels and Gaskell were a thing of the past and women and small children had been banned by law from paid employment in heavy industry. That said, there was still little of the picturesque in Jarrow in the 1890s. Today we savor the rugged glories of ancient Northumbria with its moors and crags and castles, but in 1900 you needed spare time and money to reach them, and, for a working class Jarrovian like Bob Croft, those were both in short supply. To feed their families, men had to work ten-hour days, five-days a week, fifty weeks a year in often filthy and dangerous conditions.  Infectious disease, notably tuberculosis, still ran rampant, and the average life expectancy for working class men and women was only edging into the mid- thirties. Proximity to heavy industry and the reliance of households on soft coal for heating meant that the air in Jarrow was heavily polluted.

Thus, Bob’s destiny circa 1900 seemed to be a hard one. He would start earning his keep as soon as someone was ready to employ him, probably in the Palmer shipyards, marry young, have children whose hold on life was tenuous, and live his life on Tyneside where his family on both sides had been settled for a generation or more.

But the life Bob was able in fact to carve out for himself was very different in large part because he was sent to school. There he had the time not only to learn but to develop his athletic skills.

3. Acquiring the Three “R”s

It turns out that being born in 1892--not 1862 or even 1882—was important. By the time Bob was five, the lawmakers of England had decided it was in the national interest to inculcate basic literacy and numeracy in even the poorest citizens. By the last decade of the nineteenth century, five years of education for every English and Welsh child, male and female, was mandated by law, and a nation-wide system of free local schools had been put in place.  

What Bob learned in school was, by our twenty-first century standards, not very much--what we Brits used to call “the three Rs”, reading, writing, and ‘rithmatic, plus a heavy dose of scripture and prayer—and school was no picnic circa 1900. The state elementary schools were grim, gray, unheated stone buildings, the lavatories outside in the yard rarely flushed, toilet paper was unknown, and a class size of forty or more was common. All the same, real progress had been made in education. Children sat not on benches but at individual wooden desks with lids that opened to contain books and with holes on top for ink wells that were filled each day by the ink monitor. The pens Bob used were made of wood and metal, not sharpened quills, and he wrote in exercise books, not on slates.  However, teachers still droned on through the day, and they were armed with rulers for rapping the knuckles of both sexes and with canes for delivering ten of the best to the bare bums of naughty boys. As diversion and additional trauma, a pupil would from time to time be summoned to the front of the class to write a word or do a sum with chalk on the blackboard.

The girls of Bob’s generation tended to like school and do well as they took readily to sitting at a desk. This was a time when girls were enjoined to be still and quiet from infancy and spent hours of the day doing handwork. Better yet, at school, girls had the chance to make friends from outside the family, and, as so many memoirs testify, this creation of a peer group was a revolution in the history of female relationships. When at school, girls also had scheduled times in the day for free, unsupervised play just like the boys, and this too was new and wondrous.

But for boys used to being outside and running free when not working or doing chores, school was hard, and my guess is that Bob Croft may have been one of the troublemakers at school. In my mind’s eye I see Bob as a boy trudging off to school of a cold, dark winter’s morning in his rough flannel shorts and shirt, hob-nailed boots, and the woolly sweater and socks his auntie had knitted. I see him squirming at his desk, launching ink pellets with his ruler, pulling the pigtails of the girl in front—who had a crush on him since he was a nice-looking lad --and longing for the bell that sounded the break at eleven, the lunch hour around 12.30, and the end of the school day at four.

Five years of education like that may not sound like much, but keep in mind that circa 1900 perhaps 20% of the MALE population in Imperial Russia could read and write, that in Imperial China only about 5% of MEN could do the same, and that in both countries literacy rates for women were much lower.

Reuben Henry Lewis Croft was lucky. Instead of earning a few coppers doing odd jobs as early as age six and joining the full-time work force before he hit his teens as his forefathers and foremothers had, he got to go to school for five years. There he proved to have a good mind and was taught to read fluently and to write what he needed to write. By the time Bob entered the work force at the age of eleven, literacy had become essential to social advancement. Thus, Bob started with a big advantage not only over his ancestors but over the many working-class men of his generation who resisted schooling and then failed to find a wife who could do the reading and writing for them. And there was one part of the school day when, I am willing to bet based on his later reputation as an excellent whist player and a winning gambler, young Bob paid attention That was "sums”.

It may be hard to believe today when even the U.S.A.  has gone mostly decimal and every child has a phone with a calculator that can even manage logarithms, but well into the second half of the twentieth century, elementary school children in Great Britain spent hours every week on “sums”. Every day they recited the “times tables” up to twelve (“seven sevens are forty-nine, seven eights are fifty-six”, how well I remember it!) and did basic arithmetical calculations on paper, on the blackboard, and in their heads. My Nana told me that the nightmare of being unable to do her “tables” drove her out of school at fourteen. Algebra drove my mother out of high school at fifteen. In the 1950s, geometry came close to being my own educational Nemesis.

Bob had a head for numbers and calculations, but all boys like him were well advised to attend when it was time to do sums. For men of his generation whose lot in life was to enter the work force early and earn enough to support a family, quick mental computation was an essential life skill. To get along in life, much less move up in business, you had to manage your guineas, pounds, shillings and pence, your feet, inches, yards, furlongs, and miles, your ounces, pounds, stones, and tons, your pints, gills, quarts, and gallons.

Allow me once again to digress and note that this atavistic fandango of measurements was still the bane of childhoods like my own in the 1950s. In January 1953, I was summoned by letter to the College of Technology and Commerce in Cathays Park, Cardiff to sit the Secondary School Admission exam, universally known as the Eleven-Plus. I was obliged to take the eleven plus exam in Cardiff city center because it was not offered at the convent school run by an order of Belgian nuns which I attended.

This exam was put in force in 1944 to sort the sheep from the goats, or, more officially, to determine the academic potential of the non-private-school British population. Those passing the exam were dispatched to a ranked set of local high schools, and the rest went to the so- called secondary modern school nearest their home. The exam was scheduled over a day and a half and was made up of three parts--the Intelligence Test, the English Test, and the Arithmetic Test which, if my memory serves me right, was further subdivided into Mental (100 sums to do in your head in 15 minutes) and Mechanical (where you worked 100 sums on paper in 25 minutes).

My elders urgently told me that the Elven-Plus was very important, and they were not wrong. The shape of my whole life would indeed be determined by this exam, and it was the arithmetic test that had me quaking in my black Oxford shoes and hand-knitted wool socks when I set off on the bus to the town center that January day.

At Our Lady’s Convent for Girls, I had excelled at catechism and French and made a solid B+ in arithmetic by getting extra credit for drawing beautiful straight lines above and below every wrong answer. My skill with a ruler was clearly not going to get me through the Eleven Plus , however, so, for some six months before the exam, family members bombarded me at lunch and teatime with questions about how many thises make a that. “I love you a bushel and a peck’, goes the old song. Well, as a ten-year-old, I was expected to do sums involving bushels and pecks in my head-- fast.

The family’s tutoring method was a nightmare for me, but it worked. I got a place at the best high school in Cardiff. What’s more, unlike so many other odd bits of knowledge I absorbed in youth—I mean, who cares if “in March, July, October, May, the Nones fall on the seventh day”?!--mental arithmetic has come in handy in my adult American life. When I was a young professor, I found to my surprise that I could add up exam marks faster than anyone in my department. To this day, when needing to make a rough estimate of what something might cost, I am pretty close to the mark. My favorite memory-enhancing game on the computer is bridge, in which one is constantly adding things up to thirteen.

But to get back to Bob, it was during break and after school that he really came into his own for he was even better at games than he was at sums.  In the small, enclosed, paved playground in front of the new state schools. boys played marbles and tiddley winks, and in the autumn they strung horse chestnuts on strings and played conkers. The girls meanwhile played hopscotch, jumped rope, and did cat’s cradle.  After school, on any old patch of open ground, boys (but not girls) played rounders (a forerunner of baseball) and football.

4. Football

One of the big unanswered questions for me as I looked at my grandfather’s early life was how exactly he landed up in Cardiff at some point around the beginning of First World War and got to meet, marry, and reproduce with my grandmother. That question got an answer in a 2021 conversation between my cousin-in-law Martin and my uncle Tom, Bob’s son. Bob, Tom, recalls, had been a professional soccer player!

It turns out that those early years of schooling in Jarrow were vital to Bob not just for what he learned at his desk but for the opportunities school gave him to develop his athletic abilities. Thanks to national policy, he had years of freedom from paid work to kick a ball around and, hey presto, someone noticed him play and was impressed.  Like an American kid shooting hoops in a tenement court, at the age of eleven Bob got SCOUTED, and soccer was his passport out of the shipyard and out of Jarrow.

Again, being born in 1892, not 1882, was key to the direction of Bob’s life. By the time he was entering the work force, soccer was an increasingly popular sport in Great Britain. Different versions of football had been played in the British Isles since Tudor times, and “football” is still what the British call soccer. But by the turn of the twentieth century, soccer had been differentiated from rugby, the rules of both sports had been codified, football clubs and football leagues had been formed in Great Britain, and there was already an F.A. Cup. In the very early days, both soccer and rugby football in the South of England were associated with men educated in the public (i.e., private) boys’ schools, and were amateur sports. But in the industrialized parts of the country—in the North, the Midlands, in Southern Scotland, and in South Wales--soccer rapidly became working class and professionalized. 

For the civic leaders of big industrial cities like Manchester, Newcastle, and Cardiff, competition was an ethos and a way of life. These were hard men who hated to lose, and it did not take them long to see that, by discovering athletic talent among their male employees and paying those men to play football, they could get gold cups in the trophy room, kudos among their peers, and glowing articles in the local press. As for the players, working class young men with superior ball skills, they jumped on the opportunities offered by professional sport with both feet.

Bob and his motorbike. (Gill Collection)

By 1900, soccer players in Great Britain were earning on average four pounds a week during the playing season, and they got special bonuses when they won. Four quid doesn’t sound like much, but it was at least twice what the men could make as industrial laborers--and a lot more fun. By 1910 players were in a strong enough position to negotiate wages and bonuses and were trying to form a union. When soccer teams in the south caught on to the Northerners’ scheme, and began hiring their own professionals, players took to moving around the country and switching clubs to get the best deal available.

This seems to have been exactly what Bob Croft did. To quote Bob’s son Tom: “After leaving school, [Bob] became an apprentice footballer with Sunderland FC. [Sunderland was a port town close to Jarrow]. From there, he was transferred to Portsmouth FC [Portsmouth is an ancient port city on the English Channel] and transferred again to Cardiff Corinthians (nicknamed the Corries). With Corinthians, he played in a cup final at Wembley.” In the off season for the Corries, Tom says that Bob “earned money as a dentist—no qualifications, he just pulled teeth”—and indeed, on Nana and Bob’s wedding certificate, Bob’s occupation is listed as “Dentist”. Tom also remembers that “shortly before WWI [Bob] moved to work at the Cardiff Docks where, among other things, "he painted the dock gates.”

So, by his early twenties, Bob Croft of Jarrow-on-Tyne was a mature young man with money to spend, a name in the sports columns, and something of a jack of all trades. An early rare photo of Bob, lovingly preserved by my grandmother and my mother, shows him in a long coat, cap, and goggles, sitting astride a motorbike.

He was, I think, the kind of racy, self-assured man a shy, protected young woman like Mabel Salmon might fall head over heels in love with. Also, the kind of young man that her family would have regarded with suspicion verging on hostility--but more of that in my next chapter on Nana.

Why, we might now ask—setting aside the appeal of the decidedly delectable Miss Salmon--did Bob Croft settle down in Cardiff not Sunderland or Portsmouth? Well, there is no direct evidence to explain his decision, but one can see that Cardiff was in many ways a good fit for him. Like Jarrow, Cardiff was a port that, in the late nineteenth century, had ballooned after the discovery of rich seams of iron and coal in the valleys nearby. But whereas Jarrrow was dwarfed in stature and wealth by its neighbor Newcastle-on Tyne, Cardiff by the second decade of the twentieth century when Bob Croft came to play for the Corries, was already campaigning to become the cultural and social center of Wales. In 1905, the Cardiff city fathers began constructing an elegant gray stone civic center close to the castle that had been newly rebuilt by the Bute family, and to the (then) town’s commercial center. They called it Cathays Park and its founding was the occasion for much organized civic celebration. In among my grandmother’s tiny set of papers are the invitations she and one of her brothers received to two of the events.

So, to sum up, by 1914 Bob Croft seemed to have put the challenges of his youth far behind him. He was playing the sport he loved, subsidizing his football income with any job that came to hand, and courting a girl from a family that lived in the new garden suburb of Roath and got invited to civic celebrations.  And then, in November, the United Kingdom and its allies went to war with Germany, and my grandfather was faced with his biggest challenge yet.

5. The First World War

For my younger family members, it seems necessary to cite a few statistics from what came to be known as the Great War. Grim, grisly, gruesome, and grotesque might have been better adjectives since between 1914 and 1918, with no geopolitical rationale that anyone has been able to establish, death, disease, and destruction rained down on 30-40 million people, mainly in northern Europe. On the “winning” side, ten million combatants, including Australians, Indians, Canadians, and, after 1917, Americans, were killed.  

To give one single example of the—as yet!—unimaginable bloodshed in that war, on the very first day of the Battle of the Somme in 1916, the British army, which at least had the decency to keep a careful count, reported 57,470 casualties, including 19,240 men killed. This one battle lasted five-months and at the end the two opposing forces between them had lost about a million men and advanced/retreated barely a yard. When the armistice was finally signed on November 11, 1918, more than ten percent of Europe’s young men had been mowed down. Another ten percent had been blinded, deafened, maimed, paralyzed, and disfigured. Untold more were suffering what they took to calling “shell shock—what we now call PTSD--- a mental disorder that the medical world had barely diagnosed much less treated.

Bob Croft was one of the lucky young men who survived the carnage apparently unscathed, and, knowing what I know now about the First World War, I see this as almost a miracle. When war was declared, my grandfather was prime cannon fodder—a man in his mid-twenties, an athlete in top physical shape with no wife and family and no aged dependent parents. And, being a man from a working-class family, he had no powerful protector to offer him a cushy estate job as Lady Ottoline Morrell did to Vanessa Bell’s husband Clive Bell. Bob was on his own, he needed to make a decision and act on it, just as he did when he calculated his odds and left Jarrow to apprentice—i.e. play for free--for Sunderland FC. 

According to his son Tom, Bob did not wait to be “called up”—an expression whose dire implications would become evident with each successive year in the war. Showing a mixture of courage, patriotism, and what Northerners call “nouse”, in 1914, Bob signed up for the Royal Army Medical Corps. His role, according to his son Tom, was “to use horses and horse-drawn carts to pick up the wounded and bring them back to safety behind the front lines in France.”  

We can see why the Medical Corps might have welcomed Bob with open arms and why even the British army in its tragic unwisdom decided not to give him a gun and put him on the front lines. Here was a man with practical, real-life skills, a man who could put his hand to painting a gate or pulling teeth or managing a team of work horses amid artillery fire –and all the while scoring goals for the army soccer team when there was a lull in the action. Of course, being in the medical corps was not exactly a walk in the park. Ambulance men were at the front, they could not fire back, and they suffered casualties.  

Someone with better research skills than mine will need to research the British army archives to establish how long Bob served in the ambulance corps. It seems he was invalided out with a serious knee injury which put an end to his soccer career as well as his service in the Army Medical Corps. Certainly, by the beginning of 1918, Bob was back in Cardiff since that was when my mother was conceived.

In May 1915, Reuben Henry Lewis Croft, dentist, son of George Croft, “stock taker”, married Mabel Emily Salmon, daughter of Edmond Frederick Salmon “warehouseman”.  The young couple settled down in Roath, Cardiff with their daughter Esme, born in October 1918.  and their son Tom, born February 15, 1926. The Croft family first rented a house on Arabella Street in Roath Park, which was in easy walking distance from several members of Mabel’s large family and close to a big recreation ground where the kids could play and Bob’s racing greyhounds could be walked. The “rec”, as it was still known to me as a girl, led directly into a chain of flower parks that ended in a large ornamental lake with ducks and rowboats for hire. It is not hard to understand that Bob would happily exchange the dockyards of Jarrow and the coal fields of Newcastle for leafy Roath Park, even if it meant living surrounded by his wife’s tiresome relatives.  

In my next chapter “Nana” I will take a look at the lives of Bob, Mabel, Esme, and Tom Croft between the two world wars, but in 1942 I myself enter the family picture, and I shall now leap forward to my life with my grandfather.

6. Bob and Me

I was born in June 1942 and for the next sixteen years my grandfather and I lived barely feet apart. For my first five or so years, with my father mainly at sea, my mother and I lived with her parents at 62 Richards Terrace. This house, as we shall see in the next chapter, had been purchased by Nana’s parents, and, after the death of her mother in May 1939 and an acrimonious fight with her siblings, became Nana’s house. My father never felt comfortable in his mother-in-law’s house, and in 1947 or 1948 he persuaded Nana to sell the Richards Terrace house and invest with him in the purchase of two newly constructed flats, one atop the other, at 232 Newport Road. The original house on that site had been destroyed by a German bomb in the German bombing raids on Cardiff early in World War 2, and it was just a few hundred yards away from Nana’s old house. We Scobies--my father, after he left the Merchant Navy in the early fifties, my mother, me, my sister Rose, born in October 1946, and my brother Harry born in January 1955—occupied the upper flat and Nana and Bob (plus, for some two years, Tom and his new wife Joan) had the bottom flat. We lived at 232 until Bob died and we five Scobies plus Nana moved up Penylan Hill and upmarket but still in my mother’s native Roath.

In Great Britain, in the post war period, it was far from unusual to find three generations of a family all living, as ours did, on top of one another, in a house significantly smaller than the unremarkable 1950s suburban colonial American home that Stuart and I live in now. Two world wars had cut a swathe through the British housing stock and the nation had paid a savage economic and social price for its victory over Nazi Germany. Thus, my family’s way of life in Cardiff between 1942 and 1958 was less like that of an established middle-class family in the U.S.A. and more like that of a newly arrived immigrant family that included resident grandparents.  

Growing up, I had wo grandparents and that will seem a pretty meager collection to my own seven grandchildren who have enjoyed a grandparental cadre almost equal in number to their own. But people of Bob’s generation had got mown down successively by the Great War, the Great Influenza Epidemic of 1918/1919, the Great Depression of the thirties, and the second World War so I was lucky to have two older people to love and care for me in my childhood.

One thing that was special to me about Bob was his title—not grampa but “Bob”. Everyone (except Nana, who, in formal communication, called him Reub”, called him Bob. Now, to call one’s grandfather by his first name was rare at that time, and, as a painfully obedient child, I took a certain relish in yelling up the stairs, “Bob, Nana says to come at once. Your tea is on the table.”  It was a little cheeky, a little fun. The strong preference Reuben Henry Lewis Croft showed for the casual, unpretentious, jolly name “Bob” tells us, I think, a lot about the character of the man.

As I run through my memories of my grandfather, it seems clear that we were closest in my first four years—before I learned to read and went to school. Knowing our family patterns of childcare across the generations, I am sure there were times when baby Gilly was plonked in Bob’s lap while Nana was getting the dinner on, and he joggled me up and down and played “This little piggy went to market” and “Here’s the church and there’s the steeple”. When I was little a bit older, I remember sitting at the kitchen table near Bob and watching as he ate his “tea” which always, of course, included a big cup of tea. Bob would pour some of his tea into the saucer, soak some chunks of bread in the tea, dip them into the sugar bowl and feed them to me. I called them “boats”, and even today, if I am feeling a bit low and have a loaf of white bread to hand, I can still find comfort by eating chunks of bread dipped in tea and sugar.

One of the stories told me about myself by my mother or my grandmother was how one day, when I was very young and had been out in the sunny back yard with my grandfather, I sighed and said, “Oh Bob, I’m so happy.” This incident was related to me as a comic anecdote. Instead of “tired” I had said “happy”, I was told by my elders, but I wonder how they knew. I came into language early and it seems rational to me that, when I said I was so happy being with Bob, happy was in fact what I was feeling.

But, if I was a little chatterbox, Bob was a man of few words, and I think our relationship in those early years was largely silent. As I got too big to sit on his knee and ventured deeper into the world of words that would become so very much MY world, he and I drifted out of touch, quite literally. As I move on in time to our early lives at 232 Newport Road, only two other memories relating to Bob stand out—the boils on his neck and the food he loved to eat.

Bob suffered from a series of large carbuncles on the back of his neck, close to his collar, and these were an object of horrid fascination for me. To try and give poor Bob some relief in those days before antibiotics, my grandmother would boil the kettle and press steaming hot wet cloths onto the boil to encourage it to burst. I would watch what she was doing and was once rewarded by seeing the yellow seeds of pus pour out.  That this procedure occurred in the room where we ate is just one thing about my early life that now astonishes the (overly?) hygienic American me.

As for the food, my Jarrow heritage came to me largely through the Geordie “dinners” which were one of the trials of my early years.

Bob loved the food of his childhood --black pudding (a sausage made of congealed blood and studded with lumps of fat), pigs’ trotters, tripe and onions, liver and bacon, and, worst of all, faggots and mushy peas—patties made out of minced offal served with reconstituted dried peas. Nana cooked or bought these things for Bob for Saturday dinner (i.e. lunch), and when my father was at sea, my mother and I would sit down at my grandparents’ kitchen table and, to my silent horror, be expected to eat them too. You will get how much I hated Bob’s favorite foods when I tell you that, when my father, who had spent a good deal of time in “the States”, served me and Rosie Heinz baked beans or Heinz tinned spaghetti on buttered toast, we thought we had died and gone to gustatory heaven.

It seems clear from what Uncle Tom tells me today and what I gathered from my mother and grandmother when I was young, that Bob was a sporting man who lived his essential life out of the home. He worked as the manager of a garage nine to five, came home expecting to find his “tea” ready, and then spent the evening at the Conservative club or the bowls club. There he and his mates would have a few pints and play cards and snooker and darts. Bob was good at cards, and Nana, who played whist herself, once remarked to me In awe that Bob “counted the cards”--which today, being a bit of a card player myself, I find very funny.   In the 1930s, greyhound racing was a key interest and hobby for Bob, and he and Nana kept at least two racing greyhounds, named Jacko and Golden Jacko, in a kennel in the back yard. On weekends, Bob liked to go to the track and placed bets on horses and dogs. He continued to follow the soccer news and did the football “pools” every week.

Tom Croft, aged about thirteen, in the backyard at Richards Terrace. (Croft Collection)

Just recently, my uncle Tom came up with a funny story about Bob’s sporting love of games and gambling. Like his dad, Tom as a teenager was good at sports and games, including snooker and billiards, and, in a version of a classic betting game, Bob would challenge any man gathered about the table to beat his baby-faced son at snooker.

The first bet was a quid (a pound sterling), and Tom had to play to lose. A second challenge then was made, double or quits, which Tom had to win. This led to a third decisive game when the bet was five pounds—big money in those days--and Tom would again play to win. This set of snooker games would occur between eleven a.m. and two p.m. on a Sunday, and Bob and the victorious Tom would head home for lunch feeling very pleased with themselves-- only to find the table cleared and their food drying up in the oven. This was a big deal. Sunday lunch was by far the best meal of the week, featuring a roast (commonly a leg of lamb), stuffing, roast potatoes, two “veg” and, on the best of days, Yorkshire pudding, all, of course, drowned in brown Bisto gravy. Bob and Tom were hungry for their dinner and felt they had earned it, but Nana was adamant. Dinner was at one, and if you were not at the table ready to eat it, too bad!

These various sporting activities were not unusual for men of Bob’s time and social class, but what was less usual was that they did not stop him from fulfilling the expectations laid upon him as a husband and father by society and his wife. As Nana boasted to me several times, Bob brought his wages home to her every week, and all his activities outside the house were paid for out of his gambling money. Thus, if the Croft family was hardly rich on a garage manager’s pay, they never lacked for anything important and never went into long term debt. Bob liked a drink, but rarely drank to excess. He loved the thrill of the racetrack but was savvy enough to place his bets so that he was never deeply out to pocket. He loved his wife and was faithful to her. Both his children loved Bob very much, finding, I would say, his undemonstrative but undemanding affection and quiet sociability easier to deal with than their mother’s self-sacrificing love and acerbic temper.

And, If Bob spent many of his leisure hours outside the home, he had his reasons. Between 1931 and 1939 he lived in the house owned by his mother-in-law, Catherine Salmon, who tyrannized the family. Then, after Mrs. Salmon died, 62 Richards Terrace became Nana’s house, not his. Men of his generation were not expected to do any household chores, Bob was not a reading man, except for the sports pages, and the constant rows between his wife and their daughter were enough to drive any sane man out of the house.

When on August 4, 1958, Bob died quite unexpectedly in Cardiff Royal Infirmary after surgery for a stomach ulcer, my grandmother and my mother were not only grief stricken but shocked and bitter. The surgery was minor and had seemed to go well, and what the family learned from the hospital convinced them that Bob had died because no one was attending to him. There had been a staff party that Saturday and the nurses were too drunk to notice that one patient in the long ward was in fatal distress.

I have no memory of grieving for my grandfather. I am sure I shed some tears in response to the grief of Nana and Mummy—after all, the mere mention of Lassie or Black Beauty would bring tears to my eyes in those days--but my heart was not touched. Bob had always been THERE, served by his wife, deferred to by his daughter, chumming around with his son, sitting at the top of the family hierarchy until my father left the sea, integral to the structure of my material life. But then he was suddenly gone, and his death signaled the end of the first chapter in my life when I was as much Croft and Scobie, and the welcome beginning of a new one.

Fate did not dictate that I should become a stranger to the grandfather I lived so close to—all around me in our family circle today I see grandfathers and granddaughters finding ways to communicate—and I blame myself for letting it happen.  By the time I hit my teens, I was deeply self-absorbed, an inveterate bookworm, depressed to find myself a bony, flat-chested girl in a world of Gina Lollabrigidas and Marilyn Monroes. But education had given me the words I needed to reach out to my grandfather, I just did not use them.

For example, as part of my English “O” level exam curriculum at Cardiff High School for Girls, my brilliant English teacher Catherine Carr introduced our class to some of the poems written during the First World War. This was the war Miss Carr had lived through as a young woman and which probably changed her life as it did the lives of so many other women, and she inspired me. One of the poems we read was “Anthem for Doomed Youth”, and Miss Carr told us that its author Wilfrid Owen, aged twenty-five, had been killed on the battlefield barely weeks before the armistice was signed.

What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?

– Only the monstrous anger of the guns.

Only the stuttering rifles’ rapid rattle

Can patter out their hasty orisons.

No mockeries now for them; no prayers nor bells

Nor any voice of mourning save the choirs, –

The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells;

And bugles calling for them from sad shires.

What candles may be held to speed them all?

Not in the hands of boys but in their eyes

Shall shine the holy glimmers of goodbyes.

The pallor of girls’ brows shall be their pall;

Their flowers the tenderness of patient minds,

And each slow dusk a drawing-down of blinds.

Now, I had been told that Bob had served in the ambulance corps during the First World War--my mother and grandmother would point with pride to his photo in uniform on the mantelpiece--but it never occurred to me that an eyewitness to the warfare I was learning about at school was sitting there at the table kitchen doing the football pools. I never thought to say, “Were you ever in the trenches Bob? Did you hear the shrill demented choirs of wailing shells?” And by the time I was a university student and would have both liked and dared to ask questions, my grandfather was long dead.

And so, I would love to be able to pass on to my grandchildren the tales I was told about their great-great-grandfather’s wartime experiences--but I cannot. In all my years living close to him, I never heard Bob talk about the First World War, and, since my grandmother and mother never relayed any anecdotes, I think it quite possible that Bob never said much to them about his war either. This silence, I think, is typical. War, as Virginia Woolf once noted, has been a man’s world, perhaps THE man’s world, and while men might reminisce and joke about it among themselves at the mess or the club or the pub, they protected women and children from knowledge of it.

My grandfather Bob, unlike millions of young men his age all over Europe, survived Word War I. He was able to found a family and live a good life. He was one of the lucky ones, and he knew it. What was there to say?

7. Coda

One final part of the Bob Croft legend.

At family parties, notably the “First Foot” parties on New Year’s Eve which were part of his Geordie heritage, Bob would get a bit tipsy and to general merriment would begin to recite:

There’s a one-eyed yellow Idol to the North of Katmandu,

There’s a little marble cross beneath the town

Where a broken-hearted woman

Tends the grave of Mad Carew

And the little god forever gazes down.

 

He was known as Mad Carew

To the subs at Katmandu

He was hotter than they felt inclined to say

But for all his foolish pranks

He was worshipped by the ranks

And the Colonel’s daughter smiled at him as well.

Some ten years or so ago, in a diary of my mother’s from the 1930s, I found she had written out a complete version of this poem, and when I Googled it, I first found it attributed to Rudyard Kipling. “The Green Eye of the Little Yellow God.”  tells the story of “Mad Carew”, who, to please the idle whim of the Colonel’s daughter whom he loves “with the love of the strong”, risks his life to steal the emerald eye from the small idol in the local temple. He gives his would-be fiancée the gem as a birthday gift, but she hands it back, horrified. That night she returns from her birthday ball to Carew’s bedside to find his bloodstained corpse and the emerald gone. The little god has wreaked his savage revenge.

I find it hard to read this set of verses today without laughter mixed with rage. It is such a fascinating example of colonialist, orientalist, sexist, melodramatic claptrap, an acrid distillation of the lesser movies of Douglas Fairbanks, senior and junior, and Errol Flynn.  When I Googled “The Little Yellow Idol” again, I was relieved to hear that Kipling (whose Just So Stories are part of my children’s literary legacy) had nothing to do with it.  The stanzas were hastily composed in 1911 by a music hall performer called J. Milton Hayes, who knew even less about Nepal than I do. Hayes then performed it on the halls for many years to great success. Wikipedia informs us that the opening stanza remains to this day an oft quoted piece of verse in the United Kingdom. Go figure!

Did Bob hear “The Green Eye of the Little Yellow God” in a music hall or from some bloke in a bar? What exactly about it stuck in his mind? Did he feel that, as a young man, he, like Mad Carew, had been “hotter” (more passionate, impulsive, and brave) “than they felt inclined to say”?

If only, one cold New Year’s Eve, when Bob and I, in our roles as the fair youngest and dark oldest in the family, according to Geordie tradition, stood shivering on the doorstep holding the ritual lump of coal and glass of Scotch, waiting to usher in the New Year as the midnight chimes rang out, I had asked him, “Why do you love to recite that poem, Bob?”, just maybe he would have told me.